<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Look: Feser xChanger 480</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techreaction.net/2010/02/07/first-look-feser-xchanger-480/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techreaction.net/2010/02/07/first-look-feser-xchanger-480/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=first-look-feser-xchanger-480</link>
	<description>Technology Enthusiast Blog Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:57:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: H2O</title>
		<link>http://www.techreaction.net/2010/02/07/first-look-feser-xchanger-480/comment-page-1/#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator>H2O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 01:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techreaction.net/?p=4015#comment-578</guid>
		<description>Like I said, I did not do any of the performance testing. In Martin&#039;s testing, the Feser beat the GTX480 up until the 1866RPM point. Skinnee also did some tests (with triple rads) and found that while the Feser 360 was not the best at any RPM speed, it was very close (&lt;1*C delta T) to the leaders in the 1000RPM-1800RPM range. 

http://skinneelabs.com/triplesv2.html?page=4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like I said, I did not do any of the performance testing. In Martin&#8217;s testing, the Feser beat the GTX480 up until the 1866RPM point. Skinnee also did some tests (with triple rads) and found that while the Feser 360 was not the best at any RPM speed, it was very close (&lt;1*C delta T) to the leaders in the 1000RPM-1800RPM range. </p>
<p><a href="http://skinneelabs.com/triplesv2.html?page=4" rel="nofollow">http://skinneelabs.com/triplesv2.html?page=4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Duke</title>
		<link>http://www.techreaction.net/2010/02/07/first-look-feser-xchanger-480/comment-page-1/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>The Duke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 01:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techreaction.net/?p=4015#comment-575</guid>
		<description>so are you saying that betweem 1201 RPM and 1899 RPM fans this Feser unit is the best? What kind of temps are you getting with this? Did you have a WC setup before? Did you come from air? If so, what were the temps before/after adding the WC setup?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so are you saying that betweem 1201 RPM and 1899 RPM fans this Feser unit is the best? What kind of temps are you getting with this? Did you have a WC setup before? Did you come from air? If so, what were the temps before/after adding the WC setup?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

