I got bored the other day and started looking at SSD’s with their read/write speeds and got to thinking. Yes, when I get bored and start thinking, it can be scary, especially to my bank account. However, for once, I had everything I needed to satisfy my curiosity and my bank account is grateful! Let’s get this show on the road … Shall we?
Why Bother?
This is a good question, and hopefully, I can answer that. From my perspective and from how I set my systems up, I have always had plenty of HDD space leftover. I normally only run 2-3 HDD’s at a time. As you know, in most all modern cases, I would say there is room for 6-10 HDD’s depending on the case. Even in my heavily modified water-cooled case, I have room for 6 HDD’s.
Now the next big thing is money. Everyone knows SSD’s are very expensive in today’s market place. The cheapest one I found on Newegg was $82 for 32GB. We all know this is not recommended for an OS drive. Most people can agree that you want to be in the 50-60GB for an OS only drive, as write performance can start to suffer once the drive starts getting full.
So I sat out to see what kind of performance I could get out of old cheap 36GB Raptors. You can find used ones with warranty left on them for around $30 each, which would make a total of $120 for 144GB of storage in RAID-0.
Breakdown RAID-0:
RAID-0 (also known as a stripe set or striped volume) splits data evenly across two or more disks (striped) with no parity information for redundancy. It is important to note that RAID-0 was not one of the original RAID levels and provides no data redundancy. RAID-0 is normally used to increase performance, although it can also be used as a way to create a small number of large virtual disks out of a large number of small physical ones.
A RAID-0 setup can be created with two or more disks of the same size or disks of differing sizes, but the storage space added to the array by each disk is limited to the size of the smallest disk. For example, if a 120 GB disk is striped together with another 100 GB disk, the size of the array will be 200 GB.
Setup:
- Intel I7 920
- Asus Rampage III Extreme
- 3×2GB Mushkin Blackline
- ASUS EAH5870
- Corsair HX750w
- 1,2,3,4 36GB Raptors in Raid-0 ( Intel ICH10R)
Tests:
HD Tune:
ATTO Benchmark:
Crystal Disk Mark:
Thoughts So Far:
With all four drives installed into Raid-0, we saw a 282% increase in Read speeds and a 282% increase in Write speeds, going off the CrystalDiskMark. Just going off the sheer percentage gain, this is a massive increase in speeds. With final read/write times at 337.9 and 330.2, respectively, it turned out to be an extremely fast RAID-0 setup. So far I am very impressed with the performance of the RAID. Let’s move on and see how this would compare to SSD’s and new generation Raptors.
Comparisons:
* For comparisons I went to manufacturer’s websites and took their speeds that they have listed. *
30GB Area:
The poor single 36GB Raptor catches a severe beat-down by the other drives in this area. With the results here, a Raptor would definitely not be recommended do to sheer lack of performance.
60GB Area:
The start of our RAID-0 and the two Raptors start to catch back up to the performance of the other drives in this region. It gets beaten easily by the other drives in read speeds, but makes up for it with higher than most write speeds. You still would probably have better luck not going with Raptors in this area as well.
100GB Area:
The 3x36GB RAID-0 is still showing its age in this test also. Even though the performance is getting closer and closer, the Raptors still seem to be lacking overall.
120-140GB Area:
Finally! I found the sweet-spot for these drives in RAID. It just happens to be 4x36GB in RAID-0 to stand out and take the crown. From these tests, you can see they actually dominate the other drives of this size. The Raptors, just by massively out numbering the opponent, finally beat them into submission and dominated the performance charts.
Price vs. Performance:
I used a $30 price point for each Raptor drive. Then for the SSD, I chose the best performing one in each section to use for the comparison.
Conclusion:
30GB Area HDD’s:
The Raptor drive caught a nice beat-down from the other HDD’s. This was to be expected, and was not surprising at all. If the 36GB Raptor did win this battle, the hard drive manufactures are doing something very wrong. It’s not worth owning just one Raptor hard drive when other hard drives are at least double and getting close to triple the speeds of the Raptor.
60GB Area HDD’s:
Once we finally got the Raptors in RAID-0, it helped make them a little more respectable, but still lacking. They are still getting beaten handily in the read area but put out an outstanding write time, which was one of the best we saw in this hard drive capacity area. Now you could almost justify buying two of these drives. You would be spending around $60 for the Raptors versus at least $120 for the cheapest SSD we saw on Newegg.
100GB Area HDD’s:
Well, our three Raptors in RAID-o ended up at the bottom of the charts on this one, getting beaten by about 20-30 MB/s on the read and write speeds. They are still gaining on the competition, but a little slower as you can see. Now, you have to think to yourself whether 20-30 MB/s is worth $260 for an SSD or will $90 be sufficient for you, even though a little slower?
120-140GB Area HDD’s:
Now we get to the big difference in performance. We finally found the tipping point in the drives, and it ended up being with four Raptors in RAID. The Raptor read times were about 80-100 MB/s faster than the other hard drives in this area. The write speeds were 120-190 MB/s faster than the other hard drives as well. This would be a noticeable performance boost in running your system. The great thing with this is that you could spend $130 or so to get this performance. The cheapest SSD would be $194 from what we have found on Newegg.

























10 Comments
I did this around 10 years ago, probably was the first few people in the consumer world to do it, and it was pain in the ass because it needed raid drivers that had to be on a floppy disk when instaling XP, it was FAST back in the day comparing to 7200RPM drives only gets around 50~60MB per second
anyways, I’m still using those drives in 2 diff. machines, just doing search and this thread came up because I’ll be doing 2 Samsung 830 in raid-0 in next few months after getting confirmation from Intel that 7 series boards will support TRIM in raid-0
[...] using an old SSD for Intel Smart Response Technology RAID0 caching might not be a great idea[Blog] 36GB Raptors in Raid0 – Can this dog still hunt?RAID0 using 2x 60GB OCZ Vertex Plus SSDSoftware-Raid unter Linux konfigurierenSolid State or RAID0 [...]
SSD raids really depend on if you have the money to get them. Right now the prices seem to still be high, but with crazy black friday sales you may luck into a great deal.
As far as is it a good idea? I would say yes because of the performance boost you will see in load times. That is just my opinion though
Thanks for the great article. Answered all my questions for rappie raid. Have you heard anything about raid 0 for 2-4 SSD’s? Is it even a good idea?
Really enjoyed this article. I just set up a 4 x Raptor RAID 0 on my ICH9R (74GB 740GD-FLA1, 74GB 740GD-FLC0, 74GB 740GD-ADFD, 150GB VelociRaptor HLFS). My read / write is just over 300 MB/s, falling to about 220 MB/s on the slower part of the array. My access time is 7.8ms. Really loving the quad Rappy RAID 0. At some point I’d like to get 4 of the 74GB VelociRaptors and RAID 0 those, since I’m pretty sure my old Raptors are holding the array back.
Thanks fot a great article!
Hey man!
Thanks! Yep, it was fun to see what they can do. Kept me entertained for the day
sup Copenhagen dude
nice little review you did, def fun to see how they still are hanging on those old rappies
you seem to have missed the point of the article … just comparing some Seq speeds from SSD’s to see if they even can compare at that level.
I know they cant hang once the other speeds are brought in and especially with random access. I didnt choose to do access times for a reason. There would of been no article. I just went for straight raw seq speed to see how they do compared to todays SSD’s.
For some people who can’t afford SSD’s they may enjoy a boost of speed for cheap. This article will help them with that. If you can afford SSD’s then by all means, go get your SSD’s
You seem to have missed the entire point of SSD’s… Access time.
.08ms vs 8.40 ms… The Raptors in the final raid configuration take over ONE HUNDRED (100) times as long to hop from sector to sector vs the SSD.
just saying…
[...] [...]