UPDATE Jan 17th ***I’m seeing a lot of the same questions/rumors around the forums right now, and I just want to address a couple briefly*** UPDATE Jan 17th
-
The motherboard was sent to me in unsealed box, it appears to have been used.
-
The socket manufacturer is Foxconn.
-
Only one motherboard in my lab has any “burn”, the P67A-UD4….the other two boards are fine.
-
I’m still waiting for more answers from Gigabyte about the previous usage of this unit. And I’ll provide an update ASAP
-
I know the details here are sparse, I’m only reporting what I know.
- My contact at Gigabyte believes this is an isolated incident.
- I’m sending the board back to their HQ for further testing.
UPDATE Jan 18th ***Gigabyte is not making any official statements at this time*** UPDATE Jan 18th
I received two motherboards from Gigabyte recently for testing, one P67A-UD4 and one P67A-UD7. Upon arrival, I did a thorough visual inspection, and found the UD4 had obvious signs of “socket burn”….a phenomenon discovered last year with the LAG1156 socket area. After notifying my contact with Gigabyte about the issue 8 days ago, I’ve yet to get any word back. Hopefully this issue is not widespread.
With the last generation, it appeared that socket burn was most likely to occur under extreme conditions. But with Sandy Bridge, “extreme conditions” and 24/7 use are very close together. Will this problem be a major issue for a large number of users? Time will tell.
Feel free to join the discussion in our forums.










31 Comments
[...] Quelle [...]
[...] [...]
[...] portalu TechReaction.net zostało opublikowane wyjaśnienie dotyczące pojawiania się wypalonych pinów w podstawce [...]
[...] Hi guy, system looks great. Just have a look at this: [Blog] “Socket burn” is back with Sandy Bridge! It might only be Gigabyte that's having these problems though. Just a heads up to the Sandy Bridge [...]
I have both the UD4 and UD7 on my bench and neither has any issue with the socket. Very close examiniation of both reveals perfect pins. NO BURN……
[...] [...]
[...] 1155 socket burn? [Blog] “Socket burn” is back with Sandy Bridge! | TechREACTION Just a shot in the dark, it's probably random Q&A issue, but weird! [...]
[...] [...]
[...] close together. Will this problem be a major issue for a large number of users? Time will tell. source which includes photos. Hmm, do you still believe high voltage is [...]
[...] Techreaction blog & diskusi tentang kasus ini di forumnya VR-Zone Techpowerup Jangan panik dulu, karena belom [...]
No problem here with UD7 tested with multiple samples, the UD7 was a sample as well came just fine. Since you published this I checked all my chips and the board multiple times. UD7 has foxconn socket but 0 burns/bent pins. None of my processors show marks or burns or de-coloring on the pads. Hope that helps
[...] [Fuente] Categorías: Destacados • Intel • Noticias • Tarjetas Madres Tags: GA P67A-UD7 • GA-P67A-UD4 • Gigabyte • LGA 1155 • Sandy Bridge [...]
[...] quemado, un fenómeno descubierto el año pasado con el socket LGA1156", comentó un miembro de Tech Reaction. "Después de notificar a mi contacto de Gigabyte sobre el tema, hace ocho días, todavía no tengo [...]
[...] så skulle det kunna hända med stabila överklockade maskiner som är igång under en längre tid. http://www.techreaction.net Comments via techPowerUp! tags Intel, LGA 1155, Överklockning 36,5° [...]
[...] så skulle det kunna hända med stabila överklockade maskiner som är igång under en längre tid. http://www.techreaction.net Läs vidare och kommentera: [...]
[...] sandy will burn the 1155 soket? [Blog] “Socket burn” is back with Sandy Bridge! | TechREACTION Reply With Quote + Reply to Thread « Previous Thread | Next [...]
[...] a techsite that I didn't know existed…anyway, the details are scare right now… Check it out! [Blog] “Socket burn” is back with Sandy Bridge! | TechREACTION There will be an obvious need for more proofs, and also more of issues being raised… [...]
[...] Looks like the same issue which happened with early socket 1156 motherboards has cropped up again: http://www.techreaction.net/2011/01/…-sandy-bridge/ Don't modify but stockify! Welcome to the beige box side – we have [...]
[...] http://www.techreaction.net [...]
[...] Source: Techreaction [...]
[...] TechReaction Posted in Tech Power Up! « Monday Night Combat Beta Updated Both comments and pings are [...]
[...] guys may be interested at this: http://www.techreaction.net/2011/01/…-sandy-bridge/ Should we worry about it? __________________ Review – Accelero Xtreme 5970 My AMD [...]
This is really wierd to say the 1156 had “socket burn” because out of 8 p55 boards I peronally tested 1 was a prototype 5 of them were first gens 2 were newer gens (sata 6/usb3) and none of them had socket burn. in fact they still running today.
I figured since MANY sockets were burned it was plural…..oh silly me :p
Good point DZ. Our E.I.C. needs to do a better job
Grammar police!
“socket burn….a phenomena discovered last year with the LAG1156 socket area.”
The word you meant to use is phenomenon, not phenomena, which is the plural of phenomenon. You’re speaking of one thing, socket burn, so use the singular word.
[...] [...]
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TechREACTION.net. TechREACTION.net said: And… “Socket burn” is back with Sandy Bridge! http://bit.ly/gOYWs5 [...]
[...] Bridge? Check this out.. I just saw this on techreaction… Miahallen made a blog on it: http://www.techreaction.net/2011/01/…-sandy-bridge/ Is this for real? Not again [...]
what brand of socket is it, foxcon or lotes