Posted by Kevin Marlin on 28 May 2012 /
6 Comments
Details
| CPU |
(Some Intel® Core™ processors require a graphic card, please refer “CPU support List” for more information.) |
| Chipset |
|
| Memory |
(Please refer “Memory Support List” for more information.) |
| Onboard Graphics |
|
| Audio |
|
| LAN |
|
| Exp.Slots |
|
| Graphics Technology |
|
| Storage Interface |
Marvell 88SE9172 chip:
|
| USB |
VIA VL800 chip:
|
| Internal I/O |
|
| Rear I/O |
|
| I/O Controller |
|
| H/W Monitoring |
|
| BIOS |
|
| Unique Features |
|
| Bundle Software |
|
| Operating System |
|
| Form Factor |
|
| Remark |
|








6 Comments
I Think posting, “[Review] Gigabyte Z77X-UD3H | TechREACTION” was just right!
I personallycan’t agree with you more! At last looks like I personallyidentified a internet site worthy of reading. Many thanks, Penni
Carol if the memory sticks (each) meet the compatibility requirements of the motherboard then the three sticks would run in single channel.
Does anyone know what would happen if I put 3 sticks of triple-channel ram in this motherboard?
Would it run as double-channel?
Single channel?
Not work at all?
Tim, thinking about it I do understand your issue. I don’t think it is that it is so much a matter of lazy as it is being strapped for time (I could be wrong). I honestly do not like doing a summary because it sums up my (our) opinions on things. We want you to form your own opinion.
When the review is being done we must pick and choose what gets covered. We look at what other sites have done (if we are not the first) and we try to compliment, supplement, possibly contradict findings and give a more full picture of the product.
This review focused on the value added components of the product instead of the OC prowess of the CPU or the video card. There are just too many variables involved where motherboard performance is concerned to jump into a benchmark frenzy.
This is why there is no summary. If there were to be a summary it would be half the size if the review itself. It would be focused on benchmarks that are dependent on variables that are not able to be controlled by Gigabyte and if we had some weak components it could cause this board to get a bad review.
Sorry about that. The conclusion is just that, it is a conclusion. What we decided about the product. It is not a recap, it is a conclusion. I am sorry you are lazy and can not find the time to look through the article.
In essence there was nothing negative to say about the board. Yeah there were things like more USB ports that could have been added, all x16 slots and nothing smaller could have been used, 8 -10 SATA connectors… but then we would have a more expensive board on our hands.
This was a conclusion not a summary and conclusion. Gold was the conclusion with a crusher award because of the work Team AU did with this board.
You see im lazy, I just like to read conclusions on articles because they should generally sum everything up. Yours doesn’t…