<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechREACTION &#187; PcCI2iminal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techreaction.net/author/pcci2iminal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techreaction.net</link>
	<description>Technology Enthusiast Blog Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Core i7 975 ^^</title>
		<link>http://www.techreaction.net/2009/04/25/core-i7-975/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=core-i7-975</link>
		<comments>http://www.techreaction.net/2009/04/25/core-i7-975/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PcCI2iminal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Extreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overclocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techreaction.net/?p=470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its been a long time busy and no time for benching,on the monday i got a new sample of Nehalem and its D0 stepping ^^, already watch some D0 of 920 has very impressive overclocking results .
The model obtained the name core i 7-975 XE with a clock speed of 3.3 Ghz and an impressive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its been a long time busy and no time for benching,on the monday i got a new sample of Nehalem and its D0 stepping ^^, already watch some D0 of 920 has very impressive overclocking results .<br />
The model obtained the name core i 7-975 XE with a clock speed of 3.3 Ghz and an impressive over clocking potential.<br />
This processor overclocked to the frequency 5015 MHz under air.<br />
<a href="http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/4880/corei7975cpuz.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[470]"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-472" src="http://www.techreaction.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/core-i7-975-cpuz-300x231.jpg" alt="core-i7-975-cpuz" width="300" height="231" /></a><br />
<a title="Core i7 975" href="http://www.techreaction.net/forums/showthread.php?t=408" target="_blank">Discuss</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techreaction.net/2009/04/25/core-i7-975/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I knew it ,Core i7 920 rev D0 is a monster!!</title>
		<link>http://www.techreaction.net/2009/04/11/i-knew-it-core-i7-920-rev-d0-is-a-monster/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=i-knew-it-core-i7-920-rev-d0-is-a-monster</link>
		<comments>http://www.techreaction.net/2009/04/11/i-knew-it-core-i7-920-rev-d0-is-a-monster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PcCI2iminal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overclocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Previews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techreaction.net/?p=418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We received our first retail Core i7 920 D0 stepping from our supplier and we have been testing it thoroughly on Asus Rampage2 Gene.
Our 1st Core i7 D0 ES sample was really good but not as good as the new retail wich resulted in a final CPU speed of 4.802MHz with only 1.576v and we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We received our first retail Core i7 920 D0 stepping from our supplier and we have been testing it thoroughly on Asus Rampage2 Gene.<br />
Our 1st Core i7 D0 ES sample was really good but not as good as the new retail wich resulted in a final CPU speed of 4.802MHz with only 1.576v and we used a Thermalright Ultra 120 RT with a San Ace 102CFM (room temp @ 26c)</p>
<p>Looks great so far, these later batch i7 are great overclockers ^^.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-422" src="http://www.techreaction.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/cpu-4802.bmp" alt="cpu-4802" /></p>
<p>We are still testing and will have a full article up soon<br />
<a href="http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=544716"><br />
4802MHz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techreaction.net/2009/04/11/i-knew-it-core-i7-920-rev-d0-is-a-monster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phenom II X4 945, possible good overclocker?</title>
		<link>http://www.techreaction.net/2009/04/09/phenom-ii-x4-945-possible-good-overclocker/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=phenom-ii-x4-945-possible-good-overclocker</link>
		<comments>http://www.techreaction.net/2009/04/09/phenom-ii-x4-945-possible-good-overclocker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PcCI2iminal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overclocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Previews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4090mhz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phenom II 945]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techreaction.net/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a Phenom II 945 from Japan.  The sample I have was sent directly from AMD as a review sample.
I had it up to 4090MHz at around 1.44 volts, all done with air.  It seems to be on par with what is achievable with the 955.  Check out the two shots below to see [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a Phenom II 945 from Japan.  The sample I have was sent directly from AMD as a review sample.<br />
I had it up to 4090MHz at around 1.44 volts, all done with air.  It seems to be on par with what is achievable with the 955.  Check out the two shots below to see the results:</p>

<a href='http://www.techreaction.net/2009/04/09/phenom-ii-x4-945-possible-good-overclocker/attachment/0242/' title='0242'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.techreaction.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/0242-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="" title="0242" /></a>
<a href='http://www.techreaction.net/2009/04/09/phenom-ii-x4-945-possible-good-overclocker/4090mhz1/' title='4090mhz1'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.techreaction.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/4090mhz1-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="" title="4090mhz1" /></a>

<p>That&#8217;s all for now&#8230;<a title="Phenom II 945 Overclocking" href="http://www.techreaction.net/forums/showthread.php?t=140" target="_blank">Discuss</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techreaction.net/2009/04/09/phenom-ii-x4-945-possible-good-overclocker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

