Article is too long to quote, but this is definitely news worthy.
Check it out at AnandTech: http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...oc.aspx?i=3644
This is a discussion on IDF 2009 - Intel Shows off 22nm & 32nm, Sandy Bridge Demoed within the TechREACTION.net News forums, part of the TechREACTION category; Article is too long to quote, but this is definitely news worthy. Check it out at AnandTech: http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...oc.aspx?i=3644...
Article is too long to quote, but this is definitely news worthy.
Check it out at AnandTech: http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...oc.aspx?i=3644
Follow TechREACTION On Twitter.
"I do not fear a man who has practiced 10,000 kicks once. I fear a man who
has practiced one kick 10,000 times." - Bruce Lee
Intels 32nm process is really sweet (we've known for a while from all the PR). NIDSAT and PIDSAT are both up there, N/P-IDLIN, I've seen mentioned no where though.
So it looks like the Intel process crossover to 32nm won't be till late 2010 with only the power/thermal constrained CPUs that didn't arrive at 45nm coming at 32nm soon but the bulk volume of Intel to remain 45nm well into late 2010. I wonder how their yeilds are at this point, worse than 45nm by a significant margin but still, how much worse?
I guess you can do such fast node transitions when you have that much extra fab, labour and financial power. But moving to a node still in immaturity is more expensive, these parts will have much higher development costs than their 45nm siblings, although they will allow Intel a number of competitive advantages. Comprises all round.
There is a widespread misapprehension that human beings behave logically, but many of society's ills illustrate that most of us are driven instead by our primitive instincts and emotions - Professor Philip Steer