I had a little time last week and I done some pretesting with the HIS HD4890 1GB that it can do on cold air form outside – next time maybe extreme cooling power were used.

The components I used for the testing:

E8600 Q822A435 @ 4.5GHz 1,35-1,4V on h2o

Asus P5Q-E BIOS 2101

2×1GiB Patriot eXtreme performance PC8500 @ 500MHz CL5-5-5-15 2T 2,1V

HIS ATI Radeon HD 4890 1GB DDR5 on 100% FAN stock cooling

Maxtor 6V080E0 80GB SATA II

Akasa 1200W 80+

WaterCooling part used in the loop:

Laing DDC-1RT

D-Tek Fuzion v.1 w/o noozle kit

Black Ice GT 360 Stealth Lite + 3×12CM FAN @ 12V

10/8mm PUR tubing

2l expansion ghetto bottle

Setup photos

As usual I started on default voltage and it says 950MHz on the core and 1150MHz on memory. But I wanted more.

So I used the GPUTool and increased the core voltage on the max what it can be increased by software 1,45V and started to testing.

For 3D Mark 2003 the clocks stopped at 1030MHz for the core and 1150 for the memory with the result 76 841 points.

3D Mark 2005 I only could run at 1000MHz core and 1150 memory clock speed.    The result 29 686 points.

Same as 2005 I could run 3D Mark 06 only on 1000MHz core and 1150 memory clock speed. With the result of 20009 points.

And now the surprise. 3D Mark Vantage I could run at 1040MHz core a 1175 MHZ clock speed.  With the result of  11525 points. (12786 GPU score)

Even run Aquamark 3 but not surprised with the result. Only 248 912 points. Maybe a driver or operating system issue or something else.

Not bad results, but with a better CPU power the results will be a little better. So now I´m waiting for my new Core i7 setup.

Feel free to comment

0Ro!

Anyhow, back on topic – It arrived Thursday, in a shiny plain box – After taking it home, I finally got around to installing it over the weekend.

Overall, it would be a nice increase in performance over my 4850, and well – it’d be something to review!

In with the new! There is a Asus Xonar D2x, a P45-DS4P and a Intel E8400 powering the rest.  Plenty of ventilation, too.  As you can see

*Anakin skywalker voice* IT’S WORKING! (And yes, it’s 4.0ghz with 8GB of RAM. After much fiddling..)

So, after much fiddling it’s all good. I have it running!

Starting with the installation – fairly simple. Uninstall old card drivers, put new card in, reinstall drivers. No issues found.

As for performance, here’s a few numbers so far. (I was too lazy to take screenshots of some). Overall, it’s very solid. Much better than my 4850 – all games were played at maximum detail, anti-aliasing and AF enabled in-game. CCC settings were set to default, with advanced on Catalyst AI. From what I’ve noticed, AA is abit sharper – weather this is me moving up from 8.9 drivers, or the card itself is yet to be found, but overall I feel as if IQ has improved somewhat.

For the reviews below, the resolution used was 1920×1200, with all in-game settings set to the highest values possible. After all, what’s the point of doing any lower when you buy a faster card?

I also deliberately was too lazy and left some background programs running – Foobar2000, Firefox with 20 or so tabs, Steam (dur), and the usual array of background apps most run – MSN, so on.
Most reviewers run with none at all – leaving some open does put some extra weight on the CPU, however, and in reality quite a few people do leave crap open all the time – so why not.

I’d consider this overview more of a “What to expect on your PC.” (Even if the overclock is abit much – It’s easily achievable.)

Anyhow, on to the card itself!

The temperatures of the card were quite impressive – peaking at around 75 degrees, idling at 45. The idle temperature is thanks to ATi’s PowerPlay technology – down-clocking the card when it’s not under stress.
These were temps with the fan forced at 28% fan speed through Catalyst – so overall, if you’re a quiet freak, the card isn’t too bad at all. It’s fairly inaudible at 2 meters, and a slight hum when it’s near you.
Bear in mind current ambient temp is around 15 degrees.

The games tested aren’t too many – but these are the main ones I have installed at the moment, and the ones that I tested. FRAPS + in game FPS meters were used.

• Racedriver GRID – 86fps avg, 120max, 62min
• Team Fortress 2 – 97fps avg, 190max, 75min
• Call of Duty 5 – 83avg, 103max, 69min
• 3Dmark 2006 – 15910

As for image quality, it’s good. The key thing I notice at the resolution I play at over the 4850 is the lack of choppiness. The 4850 would stutter every here and again. The 4890? Pumps out pretty damn solidly – Overall minimum framerates are much higher for any game I’ve played so far.

In individual games, I did notice the smoke in screenshots of Racedriver GRID to be much smoother and “realistic”. Once again, drivers or otherwise, it’s an improvement. (You’ll be on 9.3 or 9.4 drivers with a 4890 anyway, so stress not!)
TF2 performance was much smoother overall – the minimum framerate was much higher than my 4850’s 35. (Attributed to the high resolution and AA/AF settings applied.)
3Dmark – eh, it’s all the same, boring synthetic benchmark.

Anyhow, here’s some screenies of TF2 and CoD. Not too sure where my GRID ones went. O_o

TF2 Screenshot 1
TF2 Screenshot 2
Call of duty Shot 1
Call of Duty Shot 2

Overall, I would definitely recommend this purchase to anyone in need of an upgrade from say, a 4670 or 8600GT/8800GT . It’s solid, it runs well. It’s still using beta drivers, which means there’s still performance to be had, and for around 400AUD, getting one in crossfire later on is definitely a performance option for the high-end market.

In retro, for your average joe – stick to the 4870. $100AUD cheaper. I would really only recommend this to those needing a good future-proof upgrade, or cutting edge performance. If you have a 4870, GTX260, or similar – don’t bother. I’d stick with current-gen cards if I were you, seeing as the next series for ATi is only just around the corner. If you really want a boost, grab another card and SLi/Crossfire!

Anyhow, hope you enjoyed the read.
Lardman out.